Eating ultra-processed foods could make it harder to lose weight nature.com 16 points by rntn 21 hours ago
thegrim33 20 hours ago Scanning through the data,The ultra-processed foods group had mean caloric intakes at baseline (2009kcal), 4 weeks (1763kcal), and 8 weeks (1769kcal).Compared to the minimally-processed food group's intake amounts of baseline (1938kcal), 4 weeks (1334kcal), 8 weeks (1463kcal).Ok? So the finding is that the fewer calories you take in, the more weight you lose. Do we really need yet another study about this? ahmeneeroe-v2 20 hours ago humans seem to be struggling with this still, so yes boothby 16 hours ago I've seen a few studies on calorie-free sweeteners inducing consumption thereby increasing calorie intake. If the story here is that eating ultraprocessed foods reduces willpower, do you maintain your dismissive stance? jjtheblunt 15 hours ago Are you saying you saw that here in this story? If so, i missed it. boothby 14 hours ago If that wasn't the correlation they set out to measure, they'd be accused of p-hacking. Studies like this are useful for meta-analysis.
boothby 16 hours ago I've seen a few studies on calorie-free sweeteners inducing consumption thereby increasing calorie intake. If the story here is that eating ultraprocessed foods reduces willpower, do you maintain your dismissive stance? jjtheblunt 15 hours ago Are you saying you saw that here in this story? If so, i missed it. boothby 14 hours ago If that wasn't the correlation they set out to measure, they'd be accused of p-hacking. Studies like this are useful for meta-analysis.
jjtheblunt 15 hours ago Are you saying you saw that here in this story? If so, i missed it. boothby 14 hours ago If that wasn't the correlation they set out to measure, they'd be accused of p-hacking. Studies like this are useful for meta-analysis.
boothby 14 hours ago If that wasn't the correlation they set out to measure, they'd be accused of p-hacking. Studies like this are useful for meta-analysis.
Scanning through the data,
The ultra-processed foods group had mean caloric intakes at baseline (2009kcal), 4 weeks (1763kcal), and 8 weeks (1769kcal).
Compared to the minimally-processed food group's intake amounts of baseline (1938kcal), 4 weeks (1334kcal), 8 weeks (1463kcal).
Ok? So the finding is that the fewer calories you take in, the more weight you lose. Do we really need yet another study about this?
humans seem to be struggling with this still, so yes
I've seen a few studies on calorie-free sweeteners inducing consumption thereby increasing calorie intake. If the story here is that eating ultraprocessed foods reduces willpower, do you maintain your dismissive stance?
Are you saying you saw that here in this story? If so, i missed it.
If that wasn't the correlation they set out to measure, they'd be accused of p-hacking. Studies like this are useful for meta-analysis.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44789446
Don’t tell me: lettuce and tomatoes are better than Mars bars ?